Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Extraction optimization and characterization of polysaccharide antioxidants from Pinellia ternata (Thunb) Breit rhizome

Xuelin Mo1, Yujie Liu2, Tao Li1, Wei Peng1, Meibian Hu1, Chunjie Wu1,2

1College of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2Key Research Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Processing Technology, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of People’s Republic of China, Chengdu 611137, PR China.

For correspondence:-  Chunjie Wu   Email: wucjcdtcm@163.com   Tel:+862861801001

Received: 11 January 2017        Accepted: 23 April 2017        Published: 30 May 2017

Citation: Mo X, Liu Y, Li T, Peng W, Hu M, Wu C. Extraction optimization and characterization of polysaccharide antioxidants from Pinellia ternata (Thunb) Breit rhizome. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(5):1129-1136 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i5.22

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the optimum extraction conditions of polysaccharides from Pinellia Rhizoma (PRP) and their antioxidant activities.
Methods: Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the water extraction conditions of PRP by Box-Benhnken design (BBD). A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was performed for determining the monosaccharide composition, while a high performance gel permeation chromatography (HPGPC) method was established for determining the molecular weight distribution of PRP. In addition, scavenging DPPH and superoxide anion radical scavenging assays were used to evaluate the antioxidant activities of PRP.
Results: As a result, the optimum extraction conditions of PRP were as follows: extraction time, 103 min; solid-liquid ratio, 24 g/mL; and extraction no., 3. Under these conditions, the maximum extraction yield of PRP was 2.47 %, which matched the optimum value (2.55 %) predicted by RSM. The results of HPLC analysis suggest that the monosaccharide composition of PRP was mannose (Man), galactose acid (Gal acid), galactose (Gal), glucose (Glc), and arabinose (Ara) in molar ratios of 5.76:2.20:2.64:4.57:1, respectively, and the molecular weight ranged from 13592 to 445065. Furthermore, PRP showed marked antioxidant activities with the highest DPPH free radical scavenging rate of 71.5 % and O2- free radical scavenging rate of 87.5 % at a concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Conclusion: RSM is a rapid and effective statistical technique for optimizing conditions for PRP extraction. Furthermore, PRP is a potential natural source of antioxidants

Keywords: Pinellia rhizoma, Polysaccharides Optimization extraction, Monosaccharide composition, Antioxidant activity

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates